Stephen Paddock: A Radicalised Democrat?

It has been more than 2 weeks since the Las Vegas shooting and details about the shooting and the circumstances before the shooting remain vague and unclear. Many people have pointed out that in a busy hotel like the Mandalay Bay, there should be CCTVs installed in every nook and cranny, yet we have absolutely no details on the contents of the CCTV footage (provided the footage even exists)! Unsurprisingly, people are starting to wonder if the authorities investigating the shooting have something to hide, and things are not what it seems.

I’m not here to discuss the specific details involving the shooting or the circumstances before the shooting, as I have absolutely no idea what went on, and neither do members of the public. I want you to think deeply about the vastly contrasting attitudes towards the Mandalay Bay shooting as compared to other incidents such as Charlottesville, the Portland train stabbings and the Pulse Nightclub attack in Orlando.

After the Charlottesville chaos when one woman was run over by a car, American mainstream media and the Democrats were right on the offensive. Day after day of relentless coverage ensued on networks like CNN and NBC, with relentless attacks on President Trump and the Republican Party.

After the Portland train stabbings when two men were stabbed to death when confronting the killer who was making anti-Muslim slurs towards a young Muslim lady, American mainstream media and the Democrats went on the offensive, accusing President Trump of fanning the flames of Islamophobia and how the Republican Party is the incarnate of Satan who is fuelling division in America. Until it was unmasked that the killer, Jeremy Joseph Christian, was a Democrat and a fan of Bernie Sanders. Suddenly, the Democrats and American mainstream media went quiet on this incident and started reverting to 24/7 coverage on the Russian “collusion”. Discussing hatred and division is not important at all if the perpetrator turns out to be a Democrat.

After the Pulse Nightclub shooting in Orlando, Democrats and mainstream media were quick to lobby for gun control and condemn the Republicans for causing the shooting, until the name of the attacker was revealed. Omar Mateen, who shouted “Allahu Akbar” during the shooting and pledged allegiance to ISIS, deliberately opened fire on party-goers at the Florida gay nightclub. As of today, October 18th, 2017, more than a year after the shooting, the investigating authorities still have no clue with regards to Omar Mateen’s motives. When a terrorist starts shooting people while shouting “Allahu Akbar”, there are other motives to look into, such as radicalised Zoroastrianism or extremist Confucianism, says no one ever. Unless you’re a Leftist lunatic who has lost control of your mental faculties.

Comparing the contrasting reactions to the three above-mentioned incidents, you can see a clear pattern emerging.

  1. If the perpetrator is white, Christian or Republican, the Democrat-controlled American mainstream media start going on the offensive, calling for legislation to curb this and that, depending on the mode of the attack. The motive behind the attack must be white supremacism, Christianity or right-wing politics.
  2. If the perpetrator seems to be white, Christian or Republican, the Democrat-controlled American mainstream media start going on the offensive, calling for legislation to curb this and that, depending on the mode of the attack. The motive behind the attack must be white supremacism, Christianity or right-wing politics. When the perpetrator is unmasked to be black, Muslim, Hispanic, Democrat or illegal immigrants, the Democrat-controlled American mainstream media start to limit coverage on the story and return to reporting on other “news” that make Republicans look bad. The motive behind the attack is unclear.
  3. If the perpetrator is black, Muslim, Hispanic, Democrat or illegal immigrants, the Democrat-controlled American mainstream media immediately start going on the defensive, insisting that the attack has absolutely nothing to do with the above-mentioned groups and the motive behind the attack is unclear.

So, which of the above-mentioned category does the Mandalay Bay shooting fit in? Category #2. When the shooter was revealed to be a white man named Stephen Paddock, delirious Democrats and the American mainstream media started dancing for joy and started with their relentless attacks on Republicans and President Trump, blaming them for the American gun epidemic (which Barack Obama failed to solve in 8 years)! The motive behind Stephen Paddock’s actions must be white supremacism, Christianity or right-wing politics.

When people started pointing out that majority of country music fans are white Christian Conservatives, a group constantly demonised by the Democrats and American mainstream media, some tolerant and peace-loving Leftist lunatics started to post the vilest tweets on Twitter, rejoicing that most of the victims are white Christian Conservatives.

When pictures of Stephen Paddock started to emerge, allegedly showing him attending an anti-Trump rally in Reno, Nevada and several media outlets outside of the United States reporting that Paddock was a recent convert to Islam, Democrats and the American mainstream media started to dismiss these claims. Paddock’s motive is unclear and is not as important as pushing their gun control agenda.

18 days after the shooting, American mainstream media has reverted to their endless coverage about the “Russian collusion” which has produced not a single shred of evidence ever since the hysteria was whipped up by sore loser Democrats, while repeatedly trying their best to convince the gullible American public that there is no link at all between the Democrats and the perverted Harvey Weinstein.

Putting the pieces together, any sane and logical person will deduce from the emerging pattern that Paddock’s motive has something to do with the Democrats, Antifa or radical Islam (if ISIS’ claims that he was a recent convert is true). My personal take on this is that Stephen Paddock was radicalised by the hysterical American mainstream media with their 24/7 coverage on how evil and Satanic Donald Trump and the Republicans are. When the “99% chance Hillary will win” vice-president candidate, Senator Tim Kaine advocated violence by calling upon Democrats to fight Donald Trump supporters on the streets, you would have seen it coming.

Just like how radicalised Muslims obeyed calls to fight against the kaffirs on the streets of Western Europe, radicalised Democrats like Stephen Paddock and Jeremy Joseph Christian heeded the calls to fight against Trump supporters and Republicans literally and tragedies have since unfolded.

Another possible scenario is that the Mandalay Bay shooting was coordinated by deep-state globalists who are trying their very best to undermine President Trump and his administration. Such a scenario is very likely, considering that the deep-state globalists and Democrats ultimately share the same goal for America, to disarm the American population to leave them hapless against Left-Wing terrorism. (On a personal level, I am not very comfortable with the idea of arming all citizens of any given country, as firearms are very dangerous and lethal. However, it is simply not feasible to disarm every single American citizen considering that the right to bear arms has been in place for centuries and any country who forbids private citizens from owning firearms should never go down this route.)

If Paddock’s motives were inspired by white supremacism, Christianity or right-wing politics, the Democrat-controlled American mainstream media would be relentless in the coverage of the shooting, considering that they’ve been going strong on the Russian nothing-burger (thank you, Van Jones!) for 11 months. Violent protests would have erupted across the United States as Democrats come out to “resist” against Trump and Republicans, and condemn them for the tragic events in Las Vegas. Somehow, apart from the odd Democrat voice on Twitter or the mainstream media every now and then, there has been collective silence from the Democrats and American mainstream media, and I would really love to understand the rationale behind it.

An 11-month long Russian conspiracy which has yielded no evidence warrants relentless coverage by the Democrat-controlled American mainstream media, whereas the deaths of 58 people in American’s worst mass shooting warrants no such coverage. It is so sinister and malevolent and what’s disturbing is the fact that they don’t even bother hiding their double standards anymore.

Make no mistake, the Democratic Party is the enemy of a free and prosperous America. Never put it past the deep-state Democrat-controlled globalists to launch false-flag attacks to rock the administration of a non-establishment President in Donald Trump. Never put it past individual Democrats to heed the call to violence to fight Republicans on the streets of America by Democratic politicians.

With the deep-state so entrenched in American politics, my heart goes out to the loved ones of the victims of Mandalay Bay. I fear they might never get the justice they’re seeking.


The Dilemma of Remoaners; Performing Mental Gymnastics

It has been a year and 4 months ever since the historic EU referendum was held in the United Kingdom. It is incredulous that 16 months after the results were declared, there are still many people who are unable to accept the result of a democratic election and are calling for the subversion of democracy by holding a second referendum, even though the result of the first referendum has not yet been honoured!

What is hilarious about the attitudes of these Remoaners is their sheer hypocrisy and double standards, and yet they don’t even seem to notice that! They seem to be totally ignorant of the fact that they hold contrasting beliefs when it comes to issues involving the EU. What do I mean by that? You’ll find out soon enough.

When the Remoaners start to get questioned by people who possess basic logical thinking, they start to squirm their way out of the debate, performing mental gymnastics to justify their contrasting views. I think that says it all about their intellectual ability to understand and analyse the contradicting views that they hold.

The main argument that Remoaners trot out is that curbing of freedom of movement will have a negative impact on the economy and healthcare of the UK. Remoaners don’t seem to understand that the restriction of freedom of movement doesn’t mean a total stop on all immigration; in fact the tightening of immigration laws will allow the British Government to allow only the best talents to enter the country which will help to boost the economy and healthcare, instead of letting all and sundry in with no checks whatsoever. However, I understand such a concept is too difficult and complex for the average Remoaner to understand, so let’s put that aside (and I’ve not even gotten to my main point!).

Majority of the Left-Wing Remoaners claim to stand up for the rights of the less fortunate and vulnerable, which is the rationale behind their demands for open borders, so as to allow the less fortunate and vulnerable from other countries to seek a better life in the UK. Their main argument is that the NHS and economy will collapse without immigrants, and Brexit will be a detriment to the UK. Maintaining an open border by allowing all immigrants into the UK will boost the NHS and grow the British economy, as most of these immigrants are skilled nurses, doctors, scientists, engineers, mathematicians (you name it, you got it). That’s according to the majority of the Remoaners, not me.

Think about this for a minute. If the majority of these immigrants are really skilled doctors, scientists and engineers, they will definitely be a net contributor to any country’s economy. The Left claims to stand up for the rights and welfare of the less fortunate, yet they support the poaching of these talented doctors, scientists and engineers from other less well-off countries so these people could work in the UK and contribute to the UK’s healthcare and economy.

Isn’t this what we call “brain-drain”? Once these skilled doctors, scientists and engineers leave their countries and move to the UK, that would negatively impact the healthcare and economy of their home countries. Mortality rates in their home countries will continue to rise, and their economy will crash to the level of Venezuela’s. Left-Wing Remoaners who claim to look out for the welfare of the less fortunate don’t seem to be doing much looking out by demanding that the UK maintains an open border to allow these talented and skilled migrants to leave their countries en masse, whereas their home countries will have to deal with the consequences of brain-drain. Remoaners love to paint all Leavers as selfish people who are racist and xenophobic. I think it’s fair to say that on this basis, the Remoaners are the racist and xenophobic ones, as they don’t seem to be particularly concerned about the welfare of less well-off countries.

When you question a Remoaner on their contradicting views, the most common response is since they’re in the UK, they’ve got to look out for British interests first, and by remaining a member of the EU and keeping freedom of movement, that will allow skilled migrants to enter the UK and it will boost the UK’s healthcare and economy, and surely that’s a good thing. If a person who voted for the Conservatives or UKIP said something like this, they will be the first one to cry “racist” and “xenophobic”! However, it’s perfectly not racist and xenophobic at all to put your own country first if you’re anti-Brexit. Can’t you see the sheer hypocrisy in this?

I think it’s apparent now that the Left-Wing Remoaners are facing a dilemma here. If they truly believe in the welfare of the less fortunate, they should be calling on the British Government to start strictly enforcing British immigration laws, so as to curb the brain-drain affecting less well-off countries and ensuring the talented doctors, scientists and engineers remain in their own countries to boost their own healthcare and economy, which will raise the standards of living for their people. That is simply not possible if the UK remains a member of the EU!

The Left-Wing Remoaners will then proceed to claim that such a scenario will negatively impact British healthcare and economy.

Hold on a minute, since when did Left-Wing Remoaners start to side with the “lazy and privileged native British people”? Surely a negative impact on the NHS and the economy is a punishment for these “white supremacists”? By allowing these skilled migrants to leave their countries for the UK, enriching the UK in the process while leaving their home countries in a state of dilapidation, isn’t that beneficial for the UK and detrimental for the less well-off countries and their people who the Left-Wing Remoaners claim to stand up for?

Since when did the Left-Wing Remoaners start to prioritise the interests of their own country over the interests of people from other countries? Isn’t that… xenophobia? So what do they really believe in? Let’s do a summary of the quandary the Left find themselves in.

  1. If they believe that the UK should remain a member of the EU, they cannot claim to look out for the welfare of the less fortunate, as it will cause brain-drain in less well-off countries.
  2. If they believe in looking out for the less fortunate, the UK should not remain a member of the EU, as it will cause brain-drain in less well-off countries.

Good news, Remoaners, I will offer you two solutions to solve your contradicting beliefs once and for all.

  1. Continue to advocate for the UK’s membership of the EU, while focusing strongly on improving the NHS and the economy, stop claiming to stand up for the less fortunate, as you support the brain-drain of their countries.
  2. Support the democratic decision made by the British electorate on the 23rd of June, 2016. Advocate for stricter immigration laws, and train your native British people to become doctors, scientists and engineers to boost the NHS and economy, which will keep skilled would-be migrants in their home countries and contribute positively to their own healthcare and economy which will lead to a higher standard of living for the people in their home countries. A win-win situation.

Dear Remoaners, isn’t it tiring to hold such contradicting beliefs, and having to perform some kind of mental gymnastics to justify your beliefs whenever you are questioned, and if all else fails, cry about being a “victim of hate”, just because you’re unable to hold your own in a mature and sensible debate?

Which solution will you choose then to absolve yourselves from further quandaries and mental gymnastics? If I were you, I would go with solution #2.