Dimwit Dawn: Face Coverings DO NOT Affect National Security?

Have you ever had the “pleasure” of reading something so asininely stupid that you ever wondered if those words originated from a human being?

Let me introduce to you, Dawn, also known as Dimwit Dawn (twitter.com/Opticheart), another Leftist fantasist who strongly insists that face coverings do not affect national security… because the Las Vegas shooter, Stephen Paddock, wasn’t wearing a face covering.

Dawn0

This is the typical reply of a Leftist fantasist.

Isn’t it funny she’s lecturing others on common sense when common sense will tell you that wearing face coverings in public, which is essentially a disguise is not a good idea. People who don face coverings in public and commit crimes are able to get away with it as no one will be able to identify them. It seems like such a simple fact, which a 3-year-old could comprehend, is beyond the intellectual level of Dimwit Dawn. Take a look at her bio.

DawnIntro

“Suffer no fools”? The biggest fool of all is you, my dear.

As if her original tweet wasn’t vacuous enough, she simply has to flaunt her ignorance even more.

Dawn2

“False equivalency”? What a complex word used by the least complex of people.

Keith Walton, another Twitter user, replied to her by stating that he would be arrested if he showed up at a bank or government office in a ski mask, which Dimwit Dawn retorted by claiming it is a “false equivalency”. Dimwit Dawn, do you even know the meaning of “false equivalency”? A false equivalency is when you compare the burqa/niqab with a facial piercing! When you compare a ski mask to a burqa/niqab, you’re basically comparing apples to apples, so there is no false equivalency here! If anything, you are the one engaging in false equivalency as a ski mask has an opening for the eyes and mouth, whereas a niqab/burqa only has an opening for the eyes!

My response to Dimwit Dawn was to kindly ask her if she would allow her kids to hang out with a bunch of balaclava-wearing thugs since they pose no danger at all.

myresponse1

Dimwit Dawn failed to reply my very legitimate question.

As a self-proclaimed Liberal, I guess Dimwit Dawn would love to engage in a logical and mature debate and is open to opposing viewpoints and discussing them. Therefore, I sent her a second tweet.

myresponse2.png

You want false equivalency? Here’s another one for you.

As I pointed out, to claim that face coverings do not affect national security because the Las Vegas shooter wasn’t wearing one is like claiming lung cancer isn’t caused by smoking as there are smokers who die in car accidents.

If you follow Dimwit Dawn’s logic, you could say that lack of revision doesn’t cause poor examination grades as you could attain poor grades if you’re sick too. Accidents do not cause traffic jams as traffic jams could be caused by fallen trees. Sexual intercourse does not lead to pregnancy as artificial insemination leads to pregnancy too. Can you see how utterly ridiculous these her logic is? Yet, she claims to “suffer no fools”. I guess the mantra that modern-day Liberals & Leftists are deluded and living in their own bubble is true.

Back to the Twitter “debate”, I stated that Dawn’s liberalism which opens her up to new ideas and differing opinions would lead to an interesting debate where we could put our point forward and support them with logical arguments. Somehow, I failed to garner a response from her. Why is that so?

dawnblock

She’s blocked me!

Like many modern-day Liberals and Leftists who pride themselves on being Liberal, she has decided to block me instead of countering my points with a well thought-out and logical response. I guess the original assertion that she made is so weak she can’t even defend it and she had no choice but to block anyone who questions her point of view to avoid further embarrassing herself.

If it was me making such a preposterous statement, I wouldn’t be able to find a way to defend it, as it goes against logic and common sense. What I would do is to hold my hands up, admit my mistake and concede that my statement was built on weak foundations, and I would do more research on the topic at hand to further equip myself with the differing viewpoint. However, that seems to be too difficult for Liberals, as they never admit their mistakes, but start playing the victim and crying about “discrimination” and “hate”, demanding a “safe space” where they could hide in.

People like Dimwit Dawn is an utter insult to the traditional meaning of the word “Liberalism” and is the by-product of the “you-can-do-no-wrong” culture in the West, indulged by the Left-Wing indoctrination machines (also known as schools, universities and Mainstream Media) all over America and Western Europe. If she isn’t prepared to have her viewpoints questioned and scrutinised, she shouldn’t be spouting these utterly ludicrous viewpoints on a public platform in the first place.

TheMelancholicGuy

Stephen Paddock: A Radicalised Democrat?

It has been more than 2 weeks since the Las Vegas shooting and details about the shooting and the circumstances before the shooting remain vague and unclear. Many people have pointed out that in a busy hotel like the Mandalay Bay, there should be CCTVs installed in every nook and cranny, yet we have absolutely no details on the contents of the CCTV footage (provided the footage even exists)! Unsurprisingly, people are starting to wonder if the authorities investigating the shooting have something to hide, and things are not what it seems.

I’m not here to discuss the specific details involving the shooting or the circumstances before the shooting, as I have absolutely no idea what went on, and neither do members of the public. I want you to think deeply about the vastly contrasting attitudes towards the Mandalay Bay shooting as compared to other incidents such as Charlottesville, the Portland train stabbings and the Pulse Nightclub attack in Orlando.

After the Charlottesville chaos when one woman was run over by a car, American mainstream media and the Democrats were right on the offensive. Day after day of relentless coverage ensued on networks like CNN and NBC, with relentless attacks on President Trump and the Republican Party.

After the Portland train stabbings when two men were stabbed to death when confronting the killer who was making anti-Muslim slurs towards a young Muslim lady, American mainstream media and the Democrats went on the offensive, accusing President Trump of fanning the flames of Islamophobia and how the Republican Party is the incarnate of Satan who is fuelling division in America. Until it was unmasked that the killer, Jeremy Joseph Christian, was a Democrat and a fan of Bernie Sanders. Suddenly, the Democrats and American mainstream media went quiet on this incident and started reverting to 24/7 coverage on the Russian “collusion”. Discussing hatred and division is not important at all if the perpetrator turns out to be a Democrat.

After the Pulse Nightclub shooting in Orlando, Democrats and mainstream media were quick to lobby for gun control and condemn the Republicans for causing the shooting, until the name of the attacker was revealed. Omar Mateen, who shouted “Allahu Akbar” during the shooting and pledged allegiance to ISIS, deliberately opened fire on party-goers at the Florida gay nightclub. As of today, October 18th, 2017, more than a year after the shooting, the investigating authorities still have no clue with regards to Omar Mateen’s motives. When a terrorist starts shooting people while shouting “Allahu Akbar”, there are other motives to look into, such as radicalised Zoroastrianism or extremist Confucianism, says no one ever. Unless you’re a Leftist lunatic who has lost control of your mental faculties.

Comparing the contrasting reactions to the three above-mentioned incidents, you can see a clear pattern emerging.

  1. If the perpetrator is white, Christian or Republican, the Democrat-controlled American mainstream media start going on the offensive, calling for legislation to curb this and that, depending on the mode of the attack. The motive behind the attack must be white supremacism, Christianity or right-wing politics.
  2. If the perpetrator seems to be white, Christian or Republican, the Democrat-controlled American mainstream media start going on the offensive, calling for legislation to curb this and that, depending on the mode of the attack. The motive behind the attack must be white supremacism, Christianity or right-wing politics. When the perpetrator is unmasked to be black, Muslim, Hispanic, Democrat or illegal immigrants, the Democrat-controlled American mainstream media start to limit coverage on the story and return to reporting on other “news” that make Republicans look bad. The motive behind the attack is unclear.
  3. If the perpetrator is black, Muslim, Hispanic, Democrat or illegal immigrants, the Democrat-controlled American mainstream media immediately start going on the defensive, insisting that the attack has absolutely nothing to do with the above-mentioned groups and the motive behind the attack is unclear.

So, which of the above-mentioned category does the Mandalay Bay shooting fit in? Category #2. When the shooter was revealed to be a white man named Stephen Paddock, delirious Democrats and the American mainstream media started dancing for joy and started with their relentless attacks on Republicans and President Trump, blaming them for the American gun epidemic (which Barack Obama failed to solve in 8 years)! The motive behind Stephen Paddock’s actions must be white supremacism, Christianity or right-wing politics.

When people started pointing out that majority of country music fans are white Christian Conservatives, a group constantly demonised by the Democrats and American mainstream media, some tolerant and peace-loving Leftist lunatics started to post the vilest tweets on Twitter, rejoicing that most of the victims are white Christian Conservatives.

When pictures of Stephen Paddock started to emerge, allegedly showing him attending an anti-Trump rally in Reno, Nevada and several media outlets outside of the United States reporting that Paddock was a recent convert to Islam, Democrats and the American mainstream media started to dismiss these claims. Paddock’s motive is unclear and is not as important as pushing their gun control agenda.

18 days after the shooting, American mainstream media has reverted to their endless coverage about the “Russian collusion” which has produced not a single shred of evidence ever since the hysteria was whipped up by sore loser Democrats, while repeatedly trying their best to convince the gullible American public that there is no link at all between the Democrats and the perverted Harvey Weinstein.

Putting the pieces together, any sane and logical person will deduce from the emerging pattern that Paddock’s motive has something to do with the Democrats, Antifa or radical Islam (if ISIS’ claims that he was a recent convert is true). My personal take on this is that Stephen Paddock was radicalised by the hysterical American mainstream media with their 24/7 coverage on how evil and Satanic Donald Trump and the Republicans are. When the “99% chance Hillary will win” vice-president candidate, Senator Tim Kaine advocated violence by calling upon Democrats to fight Donald Trump supporters on the streets, you would have seen it coming.

Just like how radicalised Muslims obeyed calls to fight against the kaffirs on the streets of Western Europe, radicalised Democrats like Stephen Paddock and Jeremy Joseph Christian heeded the calls to fight against Trump supporters and Republicans literally and tragedies have since unfolded.

Another possible scenario is that the Mandalay Bay shooting was coordinated by deep-state globalists who are trying their very best to undermine President Trump and his administration. Such a scenario is very likely, considering that the deep-state globalists and Democrats ultimately share the same goal for America, to disarm the American population to leave them hapless against Left-Wing terrorism. (On a personal level, I am not very comfortable with the idea of arming all citizens of any given country, as firearms are very dangerous and lethal. However, it is simply not feasible to disarm every single American citizen considering that the right to bear arms has been in place for centuries and any country who forbids private citizens from owning firearms should never go down this route.)

If Paddock’s motives were inspired by white supremacism, Christianity or right-wing politics, the Democrat-controlled American mainstream media would be relentless in the coverage of the shooting, considering that they’ve been going strong on the Russian nothing-burger (thank you, Van Jones!) for 11 months. Violent protests would have erupted across the United States as Democrats come out to “resist” against Trump and Republicans, and condemn them for the tragic events in Las Vegas. Somehow, apart from the odd Democrat voice on Twitter or the mainstream media every now and then, there has been collective silence from the Democrats and American mainstream media, and I would really love to understand the rationale behind it.

An 11-month long Russian conspiracy which has yielded no evidence warrants relentless coverage by the Democrat-controlled American mainstream media, whereas the deaths of 58 people in American’s worst mass shooting warrants no such coverage. It is so sinister and malevolent and what’s disturbing is the fact that they don’t even bother hiding their double standards anymore.

Make no mistake, the Democratic Party is the enemy of a free and prosperous America. Never put it past the deep-state Democrat-controlled globalists to launch false-flag attacks to rock the administration of a non-establishment President in Donald Trump. Never put it past individual Democrats to heed the call to violence to fight Republicans on the streets of America by Democratic politicians.

With the deep-state so entrenched in American politics, my heart goes out to the loved ones of the victims of Mandalay Bay. I fear they might never get the justice they’re seeking.

TheMelancholicGuy