Dimwit Dawn: Face Coverings DO NOT Affect National Security?

Have you ever had the “pleasure” of reading something so asininely stupid that you ever wondered if those words originated from a human being?

Let me introduce to you, Dawn, also known as Dimwit Dawn (twitter.com/Opticheart), another Leftist fantasist who strongly insists that face coverings do not affect national security… because the Las Vegas shooter, Stephen Paddock, wasn’t wearing a face covering.

Dawn0

This is the typical reply of a Leftist fantasist.

Isn’t it funny she’s lecturing others on common sense when common sense will tell you that wearing face coverings in public, which is essentially a disguise is not a good idea. People who don face coverings in public and commit crimes are able to get away with it as no one will be able to identify them. It seems like such a simple fact, which a 3-year-old could comprehend, is beyond the intellectual level of Dimwit Dawn. Take a look at her bio.

DawnIntro

“Suffer no fools”? The biggest fool of all is you, my dear.

As if her original tweet wasn’t vacuous enough, she simply has to flaunt her ignorance even more.

Dawn2

“False equivalency”? What a complex word used by the least complex of people.

Keith Walton, another Twitter user, replied to her by stating that he would be arrested if he showed up at a bank or government office in a ski mask, which Dimwit Dawn retorted by claiming it is a “false equivalency”. Dimwit Dawn, do you even know the meaning of “false equivalency”? A false equivalency is when you compare the burqa/niqab with a facial piercing! When you compare a ski mask to a burqa/niqab, you’re basically comparing apples to apples, so there is no false equivalency here! If anything, you are the one engaging in false equivalency as a ski mask has an opening for the eyes and mouth, whereas a niqab/burqa only has an opening for the eyes!

My response to Dimwit Dawn was to kindly ask her if she would allow her kids to hang out with a bunch of balaclava-wearing thugs since they pose no danger at all.

myresponse1

Dimwit Dawn failed to reply my very legitimate question.

As a self-proclaimed Liberal, I guess Dimwit Dawn would love to engage in a logical and mature debate and is open to opposing viewpoints and discussing them. Therefore, I sent her a second tweet.

myresponse2.png

You want false equivalency? Here’s another one for you.

As I pointed out, to claim that face coverings do not affect national security because the Las Vegas shooter wasn’t wearing one is like claiming lung cancer isn’t caused by smoking as there are smokers who die in car accidents.

If you follow Dimwit Dawn’s logic, you could say that lack of revision doesn’t cause poor examination grades as you could attain poor grades if you’re sick too. Accidents do not cause traffic jams as traffic jams could be caused by fallen trees. Sexual intercourse does not lead to pregnancy as artificial insemination leads to pregnancy too. Can you see how utterly ridiculous these her logic is? Yet, she claims to “suffer no fools”. I guess the mantra that modern-day Liberals & Leftists are deluded and living in their own bubble is true.

Back to the Twitter “debate”, I stated that Dawn’s liberalism which opens her up to new ideas and differing opinions would lead to an interesting debate where we could put our point forward and support them with logical arguments. Somehow, I failed to garner a response from her. Why is that so?

dawnblock

She’s blocked me!

Like many modern-day Liberals and Leftists who pride themselves on being Liberal, she has decided to block me instead of countering my points with a well thought-out and logical response. I guess the original assertion that she made is so weak she can’t even defend it and she had no choice but to block anyone who questions her point of view to avoid further embarrassing herself.

If it was me making such a preposterous statement, I wouldn’t be able to find a way to defend it, as it goes against logic and common sense. What I would do is to hold my hands up, admit my mistake and concede that my statement was built on weak foundations, and I would do more research on the topic at hand to further equip myself with the differing viewpoint. However, that seems to be too difficult for Liberals, as they never admit their mistakes, but start playing the victim and crying about “discrimination” and “hate”, demanding a “safe space” where they could hide in.

People like Dimwit Dawn is an utter insult to the traditional meaning of the word “Liberalism” and is the by-product of the “you-can-do-no-wrong” culture in the West, indulged by the Left-Wing indoctrination machines (also known as schools, universities and Mainstream Media) all over America and Western Europe. If she isn’t prepared to have her viewpoints questioned and scrutinised, she shouldn’t be spouting these utterly ludicrous viewpoints on a public platform in the first place.

TheMelancholicGuy

Asinine Liberals: “Country Music is as Misogynistic as Rap Music”

I had a very interesting debate on Twitter on Sunday, 15th October 2017. An asinine Liberal who is unable to defend his assertion and resort to profanities and insult isn’t exactly uncommon, but there you go.

As you can see from Screenshot #1, I (@spidieboy56) was replying to Sasha Brown (@SBrown2012)’s tweet regarding the promotion of violence in rap culture. Subsequently, a rap music fan, Sean White (@seanomydog22) started to defend rap music by claiming that all kinds of music contain misogynistic lyrics and they are not solely confined to rap music.

Screenshot #1

Screenshot #1

What Sean said is true, misogynistic lyrics do exist in all genres of music. For example, it can be interpreted that Queen’s hit-song “Killer Queen” is misogynistic as the song is about a high-class prostitute, which critics claim it’s demeaning to women. I whole-heartedly admit it even though I am a huge fan of Queen and Freddie Mercury. However, the disgusting and filthy language used towards women is most prevalent in rap music.

Screenshot #2

Screenshot #2

As you can see from Screenshot #2, I pointed out that songs by John Denver, Chicago, Bee Gees and Air Supply do not contain the kind of misogynistic and filthy language towards women as compared to songs by rappers like Eminem, Lil Wayne and Kanye West.

For the sake of preventing Leftist lunatics from labelling me a “racist”, let’s compare the lyrics of a song by white rapper, Eminem with the lyrics of a song by John Denver. For equality’s sake, I will choose songs that feature women in their lyrics.

The pre-chorus of Eminem’s “Kill You” is as follows:
“You don’t wanna fuck with me
Girls neither, you ain’t nothin’ but a slut to me
Bitch, I’ma kill you! You ain’t got the balls to beef
We ain’t gon’ never stop beefin’, I don’t squash the beef
You better kill me, I’ma be another rapper dead
For poppin’ off at the mouth with shit I shouldn’t have said
But when they kill me, I’m bringin’ the world with me
Bitches too, you ain’t nothin’ but a girl to me”

in contrast to John Denver’s “Annie’s Song”,
“Come let me love you
Let me give my life to you
Let me drown in your laughter
Let me die in your arms
Let me lay down beside you
Let me always be with you
Come let me love you
Come love me again”

Eminem’s “Kill You” clearly labels women as “bitches” and “sluts” and he’s “gonna kill her”, whereas John Denver’s “Annie’s Song” portrays the singer giving his love and life to his woman. I hereby challenge anyone who is reading this to find me a song by John Denver song that contains degrading terms such as “bitches”, “sluts” and “whores” when referring to women.

I hereby challenge anyone who is reading this to find me a song by John Denver that contains degrading terms such as “bitches”, “sluts” and “whores” when referring to women. Or any song by a country singer.

Sean, who is clearly getting irate, replied to me by saying it’s none of my business and since I don’t listen to rap, how would I know what I’m talking about.

Screenshot #3

I guess Sean has not heard of the word “Google”.

When it seems like he has displayed enough ignorance, he finds it necessary to reiterate how ignorant he is.

Screenshot #4

Apparently, not listening to rap songs mean I have no idea on how to do research on its lyrics.

I pointed out to Sean that he has a very narrow mindset, making the assumption that a person who doesn’t like rap music won’t bother to do research on the lyrics of rap songs.

Screenshot #5

Apparently, I’m the narrow-minded one now, even though I do proper research on things which aren’t my interest, instead of avoiding them. Like the Leftist lunatics.

Instead of continuing the debate with logical and well-thought-out responses to support his point, or conceding defeat graciously, Sean wants me to “shut the fu*k up”.

Screenshot #6

Didn’t you claim you aren’t narrow-minded, Sean? People with opposing opinions must “shut the fu*k up”?

Sensing his double standards, Sean quickly deleted his “shut the fu*k up” tweet.

Screenshot #7

Notice the “This Tweet is unavailable” box? Sean has decided to delete his tweet about “shutting the fu*k up!”

I thought Liberals often claim to be “tolerant” and “inclusive”? A Liberal like Sean who seems uncomfortable when his beliefs (country music is as misogynistic as rap music) are challenged, and want people to shut the fu*k up instead of engaging in a logical and mature debate. If you think Sean is the exception rather than the norm, you would be very surprised. I have debated with many Liberal tweeters and this is the pattern I notice 99.9% of the time.

Sorry Liberals, while you have the right to be offended (even though being offended by differing opinions shows how childish and immature you are), I have the right to cause offence. It’s time you grow up and accept that not everyone will possess the same views as you, and not everyone with different opinions should be shut down so you won’t feel uncomfortable. The world does not revolve around you, Liberals.

TheMelancholicGuy